CHAIM CENTRE
  • Home
  • About
    • What Is CHAIM?
    • Advisory Committee
    • Our Speakers Bureau
    • Become a speaker
  • Research
    • One Health >
      • 2022 One HEALtH Student Challenge >
        • 2022 Team Pitches
        • 2022 Judges
        • 2022 Case Study
      • 2021 One HEALtH Student Challenge >
        • Challenge Winners
        • All Teams
        • Judges
        • Case Study
    • Environmental and Occupational Health >
      • Occupational and Environmental Health Research Team
    • Social and Cultural Health Inequities >
      • BLM Statement & Resources
      • Ethnoracial Analysis Project 2020
      • Indigenous Resources >
        • 2021 Community Projects
        • 2022 Community Projects
        • National Indigenous Peoples Day 2021
      • Walking Together in Two Worlds Workshops >
        • W2W - Agenda
        • W2W - Organizing Group
        • W2W - Student Presenters
        • W2W - Academic Presenters
    • Stress, Trauma, and Resilience >
      • Stress, Trauma and Resilience Working Group
      • 2022 STAR Symposium
    • Probing Questions >
      • The Microbiome
    • 2021 Summer Student Projects
  • Newsletter
  • Blog
    • Archived
  • Podcast
  • Resources
    • Knowledge Translation
    • Videos
  • Contact us

CHAIM BLOG

Will you wear a mask if I wear a mask? A cultural and political perspective on mask usage during the COVID-19 pandemic

3/16/2023

0 Comments

 
By Emily Tippins, Carleton Graduate Student
Face masks have been a predominant symbol of the COVID-19 pandemic. However, mask mandates and mandates in general have been—and continue to be—quite divisive. With conflicting political and scientific messaging about the virus, many individuals are left unsure about the science behind masking and if they should continue to be worn to protect their health and the health of others. Previous studies have speculated that culture plays a fundamental role in shaping people’s response and subsequent health behaviours during the COVID-19 pandemic (see Biddlestone et al., 2020; Lu et al., 2021). It has become increasingly apparent that behavioural science is essential for understanding and addressing the decisions on whether to refuse or adhere to health guidelines, as well as the influential role that cultural perspectives and political messaging have on these behaviours.
Picture
Historically, face masks have played an important role in protecting against the spread of infection (Bakshi et al., 2021). Masks were first aimed to stop bad smells until the 1700s when their medical functions became known. The “miasmatic” theory of disease hypothesized that most diseases were caused by inhaling a “miasma,” thought to be infected air through exposure to corpses and the exhalations of infected individuals (Halliday, 2001). As developments in the field of microbiology were made during the 1800s, miasmatic theory was disproved, and the mask began to transform from the iconic bird-beak masks (see Figure 1; mask A) which were filled with herbal materials thought to keep off the plague, to be more suitable to healthcare needs (see Figure 1; mask C; Lynteris, 2018). As health risks associated with asbestos inhalation became apparent and the risk of the inhalation of toxic dust was identified among mining and construction workers, recommendations were put in place to use masks in workplaces where exposure to harmful chemicals occurs (Goh et al., 2020). Presently, medical technology has advanced, and a large variety of face masks have been developed, many of which are being used by the general population for protection against COVID-19. However, even with the variety of masks available, the data is still unclear on how well they work or when to use them. Earlier this year, a Cochrane review was published suggesting that face masks don’t work in community settings. However, many experts criticized this review’s methodology and assumptions regarding infection transmission and warned that the conclusions are misleading. Contentious political discourse discrediting and discouraging the use of face masks has added to the confusion and decreased public adherence to this protective health behaviour around the world (Bakshi et al., 2021).

One identified reason for the lack of compelling evidence on the efficacy of public mask wearing is the lack of controlled trials due to logistical and ethical reasons during the pandemic (Ju et al., 2021). Furthermore, it is thought that the primary route of transmission of COVID-19 is via respiratory particles; however, even this notion has been criticized. A systematic review sponsored by the World Health Organization (WHO) indicated that mask-wearing reduces transmissibility per contact by reducing transmission of infected respiratory particles (Chu et al., 2020). However, the amount of protection you receive from a mask depends on the quality of the mask and how well it fits. Thankfully, guidance from reputable sources like the Public Health Agency of Canada and the WHO have resources on proper COVID-19 mask use. Despite these available resources, many individuals still choose to not wear a mask in public spaces.
Picture
​We now understand that face masks are most effective when 100% of the individuals in a public space are wearing one (Chu et al., 2020). Therefore, in order for protective face masks (in conjunction with other preventive health measures) to mitigate the transmission of COVID-19, they  must be viewed as the standard acceptable behaviour by the general public in order to adopt and maintain this social norm (Bokemper et al., 2021). Research has shown that culture fundamentally shapes how people respond to crises like the COVID-19 pandemic (see Lu et al., 2021). It has also been found that collectivist cultures demonstrate greater adherence to social norms (see Tripathi & Leviatan, 2003). Collectivism encapsulates the tendency to be more concerned with the group’s needs, goals, and interests than with individualistic-oriented interests (Markus & Kitayama, 2010). It has been speculated that a sense of collectivism may improve individuals’ attitudes toward behaviours that involve personal discomfort, such as masking. Places with cultures that are considered to be more collectivist (e.g., Japan, Taiwan, and South Korea) contained the spread of COVID-19 more effectively than places with more individualist cultures (e.g., United States, Spain, and Italy; Biddlestone et al., 2020). Unfortunately, people in individualist cultures often prioritize their personal convenience or preference while ignoring the collective consequences of doing so. For example, although properly fitted masks effectively protect against COVID-19, they can be uncomfortable and create inconvenience. Thus, more community-minded thinking that aligns with collectivist cultural norms would need to be adopted in order to encourage mask-wearing in public settings.

Picture
Leadership is critical in adopting collectivist cultural norms (Lu et al., 2021). Unfortunately, the politicization of masks has led some individuals to not fully adopt masking due to political polarization. In fact, some report that choosing to wear a mask may be seen as making a political statement. Policy recommendations and the public acceptability of mask-wearing falls largely on the shoulders of government. As COVID-19 continues to spread, governments around the world debated on whether to recommend or mandate the use of masks in public. After the lifting of mandates in several countries, including Canada, responsibility to wear a mask shifted from a collective effort to an individual responsibility. However, Canada’s top doctors still recommend wearing a mask—even without mandates. The conflicting messaging between politicians and public health officials has become more confusing, leaving the decision to wear a mask in public up to individual comfort level. Unfortunately, people need guidance in times of uncertainty and that guidance cannot be nuanced (Capurro et al., 2021). Nuance will only create further confusion and increase potential opportunities for misinformation.

As Canadians grow increasingly frustrated with the changing messaging and restrictions one message has become clear. We must now “learn to live with the virus.” But what exactly does living with COVID-19 entail? In order to move forward in a safe manner, there must be better efforts to bridge the gap between politics and science. Public health messaging must consider the motivational roots of health behaviours. In order to encourage individuals to continue to wear face masks without a mandated requirement to do so, strategies to increase collectivist behaviours must be considered. Understanding cultural differences and the power of social norms will provide insight into the current pandemic and help us prepare for future crises.
References:
  1. Bakshi, A. J., Deshmukh, J., & Kumar, S. (2021). The psychology of pandemics: Preparing for the next global outbreak of infectious disease. British Journal of Guidance & Counselling, 49(4), 633–636. https://doi.org/10.1080/03069885.2021.1949809
  2. Biddlestone, M., Green, R., & Douglas, K. M. (2020). Cultural orientation, power, belief in conspiracy theories, and intentions to reduce the spread of COVID-19. British Journal of Social Psychology, 59(3), 663–673. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12397
  3. Bokemper, S. E., Cucciniello, M., Rotesi, T., Pin, P., Malik, A. A., Willebrand, K., Paintsil, E. E., Omer, S. B., Huber, G. A., & Melegaro, A. (2021). Experimental evidence that changing beliefs about mask efficacy and social norms increase mask wearing for COVID-19 risk reduction: Results from the United States and Italy. PLoS ONE, 16(10), e0258282–e0258282. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0258282
  4. Capurro, G., Jardine, C. G., Tustin, J., & Driedger, M. (2021). Communicating scientific uncertainty in a rapidly evolving situation: A framing analysis of Canadian coverage in early days of COVID-19. BMC Public Health, 21(1), 2181. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-021-12246-x
  5. Chu, D. K., Akl, E. A., Duda, S., Solo, K., Yaacoub, S., Schünemann, H. J., & COVID-19 Systematic Urgent Review Group Effort (SURGE) study authors. (2020). Physical distancing, face masks, and eye protection to prevent person-to-person transmission of SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet (London, England), 395(10242), 1973–1987. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(20)31142-9
  6. Goh, Y., Tan, B. Y. Q., Bhartendu, C., Ong, J. J. Y., & Sharma, V. K. (2020). The face mask: How a real protection becomes a psychological symbol during Covid-19? Brain, Behavior, and Immunity, 88, 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbi.2020.05.060
  7. Halliday, S. (2001). Death and miasma in Victorian London: An obstinate belief. BMJ, 323(7327), 1469–1471. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.323.7327.1469
  8. Ju, J. T. J., Boisvert, L. N., & Zuo, Y. Y. (2021). Face masks against COVID-19: Standards, efficacy, testing and decontamination methods. Advances in Colloid and Interface Science, 292, 102435. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cis.2021.102435
  9. Lu, J. G., Jin, P., & English, A. S. (2021). Collectivism predicts mask use during COVID-19. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 118(23), e2021793118. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2021793118
  10. Lynteris, C. (2018). Plague masks: The visual emergence of anti-epidemic personal protection equipment. Medical Anthropology, 37(6), 442–457. https://doi.org/10.1080/01459740.2017.1423072
  11. Markus, H. R., & Kitayama, S. (2010). Cultures and selves: A cycle of mutual constitution. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 5(4), 420–430. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691610375557
  12. Tripathi, R. C., & Leviatan, U. (2003). Individualism and collectivism: In search of a product or process? Culture & Psychology, 9(1), 79–88. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354067X03009001005
This blog was originally written as part of the HLTH5402 course.
0 Comments

    Archives

    March 2023
    February 2023
    January 2023
    December 2022
    October 2022
    September 2022
    June 2022
    May 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    December 2021
    October 2021
    August 2021
    July 2021
    June 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    September 2020

    January-June 2020
    ​2019
    2018
    2017
    2016
    ​2015

    Categories

    All
    Environmental And Occupational Health
    HLTH5402
    Mental Health
    One Health
    Probing Questions
    Resilience
    Social & Cultural Health Inequities
    Stress
    Trauma

    RSS Feed

  • Home
  • About
    • What Is CHAIM?
    • Advisory Committee
    • Our Speakers Bureau
    • Become a speaker
  • Research
    • One Health >
      • 2022 One HEALtH Student Challenge >
        • 2022 Team Pitches
        • 2022 Judges
        • 2022 Case Study
      • 2021 One HEALtH Student Challenge >
        • Challenge Winners
        • All Teams
        • Judges
        • Case Study
    • Environmental and Occupational Health >
      • Occupational and Environmental Health Research Team
    • Social and Cultural Health Inequities >
      • BLM Statement & Resources
      • Ethnoracial Analysis Project 2020
      • Indigenous Resources >
        • 2021 Community Projects
        • 2022 Community Projects
        • National Indigenous Peoples Day 2021
      • Walking Together in Two Worlds Workshops >
        • W2W - Agenda
        • W2W - Organizing Group
        • W2W - Student Presenters
        • W2W - Academic Presenters
    • Stress, Trauma, and Resilience >
      • Stress, Trauma and Resilience Working Group
      • 2022 STAR Symposium
    • Probing Questions >
      • The Microbiome
    • 2021 Summer Student Projects
  • Newsletter
  • Blog
    • Archived
  • Podcast
  • Resources
    • Knowledge Translation
    • Videos
  • Contact us