CHAIM CENTRE
  • Home
  • About
    • What Is CHAIM?
    • Advisory Committee
    • Our Speakers Bureau
    • Become a speaker
  • Research
    • One Health >
      • 2022 One HEALtH Student Challenge >
        • 2022 Team Pitches
        • 2022 Judges
        • 2022 Case Study
      • 2021 One HEALtH Student Challenge >
        • Challenge Winners
        • All Teams
        • Judges
        • Case Study
    • Environmental and Occupational Health >
      • Occupational and Environmental Health Research Team
    • Social and Cultural Health Inequities >
      • BLM Statement & Resources
      • Ethnoracial Analysis Project 2020
      • Indigenous Resources >
        • 2021 Community Projects
        • 2022 Community Projects
        • National Indigenous Peoples Day 2021
      • Walking Together in Two Worlds Workshops >
        • W2W - Agenda
        • W2W - Organizing Group
        • W2W - Student Presenters
        • W2W - Academic Presenters
    • Stress, Trauma, and Resilience >
      • Stress, Trauma and Resilience Working Group
      • 2022 STAR Symposium
    • Probing Questions >
      • The Microbiome
    • Summer Student Projects >
      • 2021 Summer Student Projects
  • Newsletter
  • Blog
    • Archived
  • Podcast
  • Resources
    • Knowledge Translation
    • Videos
  • Contact us

CHAIM BLOG

ERA: The Continued Shadow of Racially Inadequate Research

9/8/2020

0 Comments

 
PictureParticipants in the Tuskegee Syphilis Study. (Credit: National Archives)
By Mysa Myers, 4th year Cognitive Science
​​

For as long as I’ve been a Carleton student, maybe even before then, I’ve always been interested in research ethics. I’m curious about noble and selfish motives alike for research studies, but I specifically want to understand why controversial studies were carried out the way they were. It sickens me when I read researcher and subject accounts of projects such as Unit 731, the Tuskegee trials and Mengele’s experiments, but I do it anyway in the hopes of answering a seemingly meaningless question: what made the researchers think this was a good idea in the grand scheme of things?

Picture
No matter how many angles I view studies like these at, it’s clear to me that they would have resulted in a catastrophic lose/lose situation for all relevant parties in the long run. Even if some of the acquired data is indeed valuable, history proves that outcomes have more impact than results, especially if they affect the typically minority subject sample. Despite the establishment of research ethics boards over time, a sizable amount of biomedical research still fails to account for the variability of individual differences in populations. Passionate as I am about bioethics, I wasn’t aware of this until I eagerly accepted to take part in the Ethno-Racial Analysis (ERA) Project. I had no idea that to this day, we were still having issues with proper ethno-racial representation in empirical studies. The effects are more subtle, as often as not due to their absence, making them arguably just as damaging as historical human rights violations in the name of science.

Biomedical research has a pretty irksome tendency to be exclusive. Even when studies have samples with diverse races and ethnicities, researchers usually lump them all into one group for data analysis. Sure, important results are still reported, but this standardization doesn’t do minority groups much good as far as developing effective treatments is involved. The fact that this is still a problem didn’t dishearten me as I was analyzing fifty genetics studies at once; I saw it coming, as it was apparent that the methodology never changed. At the same time, I was shocked that there didn’t seem to be much effort into making the samples more inclusive or data analyses more precise. For such an apparently progressive field, it was puzzling to see this complacency to the detriment of improving the quality of life of so many people globally.
Picture
Participants in the Ethno-racial Analysis Project: (Top) Dr. Kim Matheson, Abigail Morris, Melissa Carvalho, Mysa Myers, (Middle) Maria Pranschke, Sara Siddiqi, Ahmad Ali Mohamad, Kelly Schincariol, (Bottom) Max Kabongo, Caleigh Tracy, Dr. Paul Villeneuve
All in all, this experience opened my eyes to realities that don’t seem to be acknowledged by those living in them. I’m proud and grateful to have taken part in the ERA Project, as it gives me hope that if Carleton can start the conversation, awareness will be raised among biomedical researchers more broadly, and the results of research will have positive and appropriate benefits to all people. To some, this may seem to have been a questionable undertaking, reflecting more ideological than empirical concerns, but I don’t see it. Regardless of what views and beliefs scientists maintain, they are scientists first and people second when conducting research. Empiricism is progressive by definition; in order to progress, we must be objective so that we’re far from the only ones to benefit from our work.
0 Comments



Leave a Reply.

    Archives

    January 2023
    December 2022
    October 2022
    September 2022
    June 2022
    May 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    December 2021
    October 2021
    August 2021
    July 2021
    June 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    September 2020

    January-June 2020
    ​2019
    2018
    2017
    2016
    ​2015

    Categories

    All
    Environmental And Occupational Health
    HLTH5402
    Mental Health
    One Health
    Probing Questions
    Resilience
    Social & Cultural Health Inequities
    Stress
    Trauma

    RSS Feed

  • Home
  • About
    • What Is CHAIM?
    • Advisory Committee
    • Our Speakers Bureau
    • Become a speaker
  • Research
    • One Health >
      • 2022 One HEALtH Student Challenge >
        • 2022 Team Pitches
        • 2022 Judges
        • 2022 Case Study
      • 2021 One HEALtH Student Challenge >
        • Challenge Winners
        • All Teams
        • Judges
        • Case Study
    • Environmental and Occupational Health >
      • Occupational and Environmental Health Research Team
    • Social and Cultural Health Inequities >
      • BLM Statement & Resources
      • Ethnoracial Analysis Project 2020
      • Indigenous Resources >
        • 2021 Community Projects
        • 2022 Community Projects
        • National Indigenous Peoples Day 2021
      • Walking Together in Two Worlds Workshops >
        • W2W - Agenda
        • W2W - Organizing Group
        • W2W - Student Presenters
        • W2W - Academic Presenters
    • Stress, Trauma, and Resilience >
      • Stress, Trauma and Resilience Working Group
      • 2022 STAR Symposium
    • Probing Questions >
      • The Microbiome
    • Summer Student Projects >
      • 2021 Summer Student Projects
  • Newsletter
  • Blog
    • Archived
  • Podcast
  • Resources
    • Knowledge Translation
    • Videos
  • Contact us